Skip to main content
Email Marketing vs Paid Ads: Which Is Actually More Profitable?

Email Marketing vs Paid Ads: Which Is Actually More Profitable?

By Email Calculator7 min read
email marketing vs paid adssubscriber acquisition costemail profitabilitymarketing ROIcustomer lifetime valueemail revenuemarketing budget allocation
Share:

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on acquisition cost and lifetime value. Email often has higher long-term profitability because revenue compounds over time, while paid ads typically stop generating returns once spend stops.

Subscriber acquisition cost is the total spend required to generate one new email subscriber. It’s calculated by dividing total acquisition spend by the number of new subscribers gained.

Compare the cost to acquire a subscriber or customer with the revenue that subscriber generates over time. Look at lifetime value, revenue per subscriber, and payback period instead of only short-term return on ad spend.

A healthy benchmark is at least 3:1. For every £1 spent acquiring a subscriber or customer, you should aim to generate at least £3 in lifetime revenue.

Payback period shows how quickly you recover acquisition costs. Faster payback reduces risk and improves cash flow, especially for growing businesses.

Time to run those email marketing reports?

Let's get your email marketing reporting set up

Setup email reporting

The monthly email marketing newsletter

Practical email marketing campaign tips you can put into action.